unzhakov
876e1e3ab8
- Add neutrino mass parameter to SpectrumConfig and CLI interface - Update PhaseSpace component to handle neutrino mass effects properly - Update CSV headers to show basic endpoint and all transition types - Add --csv-verbosity option to CLI with 'full' and 'concise' options - Fix comparison plots to properly show linear scale variations - Add comprehensive tests for neutrino mass functionality
128 lines
5.9 KiB
Markdown
128 lines
5.9 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
title: "10 – Nuclear Structure Effects"
|
||
date: 2026-04-26
|
||
tags:
|
||
- beta-spectrum/nuclear-structure
|
||
status: active
|
||
aliases: [Shape Factor, C(Z,W), Form Factors]
|
||
cssclasses: []
|
||
related_components: [[corrections/06-recoil]],
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# Nuclear Structure Effects — The Shape Factor $C(Z,W)$
|
||
|
||
## Overview
|
||
|
||
Nuclear structure effects are encapsulated in the shape factor $C(Z,W)$ which multiplies the phase space × Fermi function. This is distinct from electrostatic finite size corrections ([[corrections/02-finite-size]]) — it describes how nuclear form factors and matrix elements modify the spectrum beyond simple point-nucleus Coulomb interaction.
|
||
|
||
$$N(W)\,dW \propto p W (W_0 - W)^2 F(Z,W) C(Z,W) \tag{79}$$
|
||
|
||
## Two Formalisms Compared
|
||
|
||
| Approach | Style | Strengths |
|
||
|---|---|---|
|
||
| **Behrens-Bühring** (BB) | Couples leptonic + nuclear parts; rigorous expansion in $r^2$, $(m_eR)^a$, $(WR)^b$, $(\alpha Z)^c$ with tabulated functions $I(k_e,m,n,\rho)$ | Most precise, established computational machinery |
|
||
| **Holstein** (HS) | Decouples leptonic + nuclear parts; manifestly covariant form factors | Clean symmetry properties, intuitive classification |
|
||
|
||
Hayen et al. adopt BB's computational approach but present results in Holstein notation for clarity. See Appendix E of Hayen paper for detailed comparison.
|
||
|
||
## Multipole Expansion (Eq. 78)
|
||
|
||
Form factors $F_{KLs}(q^2)$ describe nuclear structure model-independently:
|
||
|
||
$$\langle f | V_\mu - A_\mu | i \rangle \propto \sum_{KMs} \sum_{L=K-1}^{K+1} (-1)^{J_f-M_f+M} (-i)^L F_{KLs}(q^2) $$
|
||
$$\times \sqrt{4\pi(2J_i+1)} \begin{pmatrix} J_f & K & J_i \\ -M_f & M & M_i \end{pmatrix} \frac{(qR)^L}{(2L+1)!!}$$
|
||
|
||
Since $(qR)^2$ is very small for beta decay, expansion typically stops after first order.
|
||
|
||
## Impulse Approximation (Eq. 80–81)
|
||
|
||
Nucleons treated as non-interacting particles coupling to weak vertex as free particles:
|
||
|
||
$$O_{KLs} = \sum_{\alpha,\beta} \langle \alpha | O_{KLs} | \beta \rangle a^\dagger_\alpha a_\beta \tag{80}$$
|
||
$$\langle f | O_{KLs} | i \rangle = \sum_{\alpha,\beta} \langle \alpha | O_{KLs} | \beta \rangle \langle f | a^\dagger_\alpha a_\beta | i \rangle \tag{81}$$
|
||
|
||
The one-body density matrix elements $\langle f | a^\dagger_\alpha a_\beta | i \rangle$ are calculable via shell model methods.
|
||
|
||
> [!warning] Limitations
|
||
> The impulse approximation neglects many-body effects:
|
||
> - **Meson exchange**: long history (Blin-Stoyle, Chemtob & Rho)
|
||
> - **Core polarization**: nuclear medium modifications
|
||
>
|
||
> For allowed decays, results largely hold due to cancellations between core-polarization and meson exchange (Morita 1985), but individual effects can reach ~40%.
|
||
|
||
## Induced Currents — Form Factor Classification
|
||
|
||
See [[corrections/06-recoil]] for detailed equations. Key points:
|
||
|
||
### First-Class Currents (CVC/PCAC)
|
||
- **Vector** $g_V$: conserved, from EM data via CVC
|
||
- **Weak magnetism** $(g_M - g_V)/2M$: determined by CVC from M1 transitions
|
||
- **Axial-vector** $g_A$: measured in neutron decay
|
||
- **Induced pseudoscalar** $g_P/2M$: PCAC predicts ~−229, quenched ~80% in nuclei
|
||
|
||
### Second-Class Currents (G-parity forbidden)
|
||
- **Induced scalar** $g_S/2M$: excluded by CVC for Fermi transitions
|
||
- **Induced tensor** $g_{II}/2M$: experimental null results; reduces to first-class component only
|
||
|
||
## Nuclear Matrix Element Operators (Table V of Hayen)
|
||
|
||
| Operator | Symbol | Type | $\Delta J$ |
|
||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||
| $M_F$ | Fermi matrix element | Vector | 0 |
|
||
| $M_{GT}$ | Gamow-Teller matrix element | Axial-vector | 0,1 (not 0→0) |
|
||
| $M_L$ | Longitudinal vector | — | depends on K |
|
||
| $M_{T}, M_{TL}$ | Transverse multipoles | — | depends on K |
|
||
|
||
## Validity of Impulse Approximation
|
||
|
||
- **Vector current**: conserved via CVC → impulse approximation reliable
|
||
- **Axial current**: broken by PCAC → quenching effects significant (up to 80% for $g_P$)
|
||
- Mesonic degrees of freedom absorbed into nuclear potential (Wilkinson 1974)
|
||
|
||
## Nuclear Deformation Correction $D_C(Z,W,\beta^2)$
|
||
|
||
The nuclear structure analogue of the electrostatic deformation correction ([[corrections/02-finite-size]]):
|
||
- Accounts for non-spherical nuclear shape in convolution terms
|
||
- Partially cancels with $DFS$ correction (electrostatic)
|
||
- Relevant for deformed nuclei ($\beta_2 \neq 0$)
|
||
|
||
## Calculator Status
|
||
|
||
> [!info] Implementation Planned
|
||
> The shape factor $C(Z,W; g_A)$ is being implemented as `ShapeFactorGA` component. See `.rpiv/artifacts/research/2026-05-27_gA-spectrum-shape-factor-implementation.md` for the implementation plan.
|
||
|
||
## Latest Research (May 2026)
|
||
|
||
### Key Findings from Paulsen et al. (2024) Fig. 9
|
||
|
||
The spectral shape of ⁹⁹Tc β decay is **highly sensitive to g_A** in the low-energy region (0–100 keV):
|
||
|
||
- **Small g_A (0.5–1.0)**: Bell-shaped spectrum with low-energy enhancement
|
||
- **Large g_A (1.4–2.0)**: Flattened spectrum with low-energy suppression
|
||
- **Crossover point**: All spectra intersect around 100 keV
|
||
|
||
### g_A Values — Resolved
|
||
|
||
| Source | g_A^eff | Method | Status |
|
||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||
| Paulsen et al. (2024) | 1.526(92) | CVC-fixed sNME | Enhanced (controversial) |
|
||
| Song et al. (2025) | 1.0–1.2 | ESSM (farCVC) | Quenched (recommended) |
|
||
|
||
**Resolution**: The discrepancy is resolved by proper sNME treatment. ESSM (sNME as fit parameter) gives quenched g_A = 1.0–1.2, consistent with other forbidden decays.
|
||
|
||
### Table Data Status
|
||
|
||
The energy-dependent tables for C_V(W), C_A(W), C_VA(W) are **not publicly available**. Priority actions:
|
||
1. Obtain from supplementary materials of Kostensalo & Suhonen (2017) or Ramalho & Suhonen (2024)
|
||
2. Contact Suhonen group (jouni.t.suhonen@jyu.fi) for table data
|
||
3. Use integrated values as proxy for initial implementation
|
||
|
||
### References
|
||
|
||
- [[Shape Factor C(W, g_A)]] — wiki concept page
|
||
- [[SSM — Spectrum Shape Method]] — wiki concept page
|
||
- [[ESSM — Enhanced Spectrum Shape Method]] — wiki concept page
|
||
- [[Paulsen et al. (2024)]] — wiki entity page
|
||
- [[Song et al. (2025)]] — wiki entity page
|