Files
beta_shape_pnpi/docs/07-recoil-effects.md
T

102 lines
4.5 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
---
title: "07 – Recoil Effects"
date: 2026-04-26
tags:
- beta-spectrum/correction/recoil
status: todo
aliases: [Nuclear Recoil, R_N, Weak Magnetism]
cssclasses: []
related_components: [[02-phase-space]], [[10-nuclear-structure]]
---
# Nuclear Recoil Effects — $R_N$, $Q$, and Induced Currents
## Status in Calculator
> [!todo] Not yet implemented
> Module: `beta_spectrum/components/recoil.py` exists but is **empty** (stub only). This correction needs to be added.
## Why Recoil Matters
The finite nuclear mass turns beta decay from a two-body into a three-body process, introducing recoil corrections that become significant at the $10^{-4}$ precision level. Additionally:
- **Weak magnetism** $b_{wm}$ must be included as experimental precision increases — otherwise it limits BSM sensitivity
- The oft-neglected **induced pseudoscalar interaction** may be significant
## Kinematic Recoil Correction $R_N(W,W_0,M)$ (Eq. 41–43)
$$R_N = 1 + \frac{r_0}{W} + \frac{r_1}{W^2} + r_2 W + \frac{r_3}{W^2} \tag{41}$$
### For Fermi (vector) transitions:
$$r_0^V = W_0^2/(2M^2) - 11/(6M^2), \quad r_1^V = W_0/(3M)$$
$$r_2^V = 2/M - 4W_0^2/(3M), \quad r_3^V = 16/(3M^2)$$
### For Gamow-Teller (axial) transitions:
$$r_0^A = -2W_0/(3M) - W_0^2/(6M^2) - 77/(18M^2), \quad r_1^A = -2/(3M) + 7W_0/(9M^2)$$
$$r_2^A = 10/(3M) - 28W_0/(9M^2), \quad r_3^A = 88/(9M^2)$$
### Mixed transitions:
Terms are weighted by $1/(1+\rho^2)$ and $1/(1+\rho^{-2})$ where $\rho = \mathcal{M}_{GT}/\mathcal{M}_F$.
> [!tip] Magnitude
> Order $10^{-5}$ to $10^{-3}$. See Wilkinson (1990) Fig. 1 for magnitude plot.
## Electromagnetic Recoil Correction $Q(Z,W,M)$ (Eq. 45)
The recoiling nucleus's Coulomb field differs from a static one:
$$Q \simeq 1 \mp \frac{\pi\alpha Z}{M}\left(1 + a\right)\frac{W_0 - W}{3W} \tag{45}$$
where $a = (1-\rho^2/3)/(1+\rho^2)$ is the β-ν correlation coefficient ($a=1$ for Fermi, $a=-1/3$ for GT).
> [!note] Typically negligible
> The effect amounts to at most a few percent of the typical error in phase space factor $f$ due to Q-value uncertainty — usually not limiting.
## Weak Magnetism and Induced Currents (Section VI)
The weak vertex receives QCD-induced form factors beyond pure V-A:
### Behrens-Bühring Form (Eq. 82):
$$J_\mu^{BB} = i\langle \bar{u}_p | C_V\gamma_\mu - f_M\sigma_{\mu\nu}q^\nu + if_S q_\mu $$
$$- \frac{C_A}{C_V}\left(\gamma_\mu\gamma^5 - f_T\sigma_{\mu\nu}\gamma^5 q^\nu\right) + i\frac{f_P}{C_V}\gamma^5 q_\mu | u_n \rangle$$
### Holstein Form (Eq. 83):
$$J_\mu^{HS} = i\langle \bar{u}_p | g_V\gamma_\mu - \frac{g_M-g_V}{2M}\sigma_{\mu\nu}q^\nu + i\frac{g_S}{2M}q_\mu $$
$$+ g_A\gamma^5\gamma_\mu - \frac{g_{II}}{2M}\sigma_{\mu\nu}\gamma^5 q^\nu + i\frac{g_P}{2M}\gamma^5 q_\mu | u_n \rangle$$
| Form Factor | Name | CVC/PCAC Status |
|---|---|---|
| $C_V = g_V$ | Vector (Fermi) | Conserved — from EM data |
| $f_M/C_V$ | Weak magnetism | **Determined by CVC** from M1 transitions |
| $f_S/g_S$ | Induced scalar | Excluded by CVC for Fermi; Second-class current |
| $C_A = g_A$ | Axial-vector (GT) | Measured in neutron decay ($g_A \approx 1.276$) |
| $f_T$ | Tensor | First-class if exists |
| $g_{II}$ | Induced tensor | Second-class current → experimental null results |
| $f_P/g_P$ | **Induced pseudoscalar** | PCAC prediction: $g_P(0) \approx -229$, but quenched ~80% in nuclei |
### CVC Constraint on Weak Magnetism (Eq. 87–91)
For mirror transitions and isovector M1 decays, weak magnetism is determined from electromagnetic data — no free parameters:
$$\mu_p - \mu_n = g_M(0)/\mu_N \quad (\text{from CVC})$$
### PCAC / Goldberger-Treiman (Eq. 92)
$$g_P(0) \approx -229 \quad (\text{free nucleon})$$
With ~5% higher-order corrections. In nuclear medium, $g_P$ is **quenched by up to 80%** — great care needed when evaluating pseudoscalar currents for nuclear decays.
## Spectral Shape Modification (Eq. 3)
Weak magnetism and Fierz term modify the spectrum shape:
$$N(W)\,dW \propto p W (W_0 - W)^2 \left[1 + \frac{\gamma m_e}{W} b_{\text{Fierz}} \pm \frac{4W}{3M} b_{wm}\right] dW \tag{3}$$
The weak magnetism term $\propto W/M$ grows with energy — opposite to Fierz term which falls as $1/W$. This distinct energy dependence allows experimental separation.
## Implementation Plan for Calculator
To implement recoil in `recoil.py`:
1. Create `RecoilCorrection` class inheriting from `SpectrumComponent`
2. Implement $R_N(W,W_0,M)$ per Eqs. (41)–(44) with transition-type parameter (Fermi/GT/mixed)
3. Optionally implement $Q(Z,W,M)$ for electromagnetic recoil
4. Accept weak magnetism form factor from nuclear data or CVC calculation