Add massive neutrino support and improve CSV/CLI output
- Add neutrino mass parameter to SpectrumConfig and CLI interface - Update PhaseSpace component to handle neutrino mass effects properly - Update CSV headers to show basic endpoint and all transition types - Add --csv-verbosity option to CLI with 'full' and 'concise' options - Fix comparison plots to properly show linear scale variations - Add comprehensive tests for neutrino mass functionality
This commit is contained in:
+42
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
|
||||
# Paulsen et al. (2024) — High precision measurement of 99Tc β spectrum
|
||||
|
||||
## Citation
|
||||
|
||||
Paulsen, M., Ranitzsch, P.C.-O., Loidl, M., et al. (2024). High precision measurement of the ⁹⁹Tc β spectrum. *Physical Review C*, 110, 055503. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.110.055503
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Results
|
||||
|
||||
| Parameter | Value | Method |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
| Q_β | 295.82(16) keV | MMC measurement |
|
||||
| g_A^eff | 1.526(92) | Spectrum shape (CVC-fixed sNME) |
|
||||
| g_V^eff | 0.376(5) | Half-life normalization |
|
||||
| g_A^eff (quenched) | 0.574(36) | Half-life normalization |
|
||||
| E_β | 98.51(23) keV | Theoretical spectrum integration |
|
||||
| log f | −0.47660(22) | Theoretical spectrum |
|
||||
| log f t | 12.3478(23) | Partial half-life |
|
||||
|
||||
## Methodology
|
||||
|
||||
- **Detector**: Metallic Magnetic Calorimeters (MMCs) at LNHB and PTB
|
||||
- **Energy threshold**: 0.65 keV (orders of magnitude lower than previous measurements)
|
||||
- **Energy resolution**: 0.1 keV at 383 keV
|
||||
- **Nuclear model**: NUSHELLX with GLEKPN valence space, Mach interaction
|
||||
- **sNME treatment**: CVC-fixed (not ESSM)
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Figures
|
||||
|
||||
- **Figure 9**: g_A-dependent theoretical β spectrum — shows dramatic shape changes for g_A ∈ {0.5, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2, 1.4, 1.6, 2.0}
|
||||
- **Figure 10**: Best-fit theoretical spectrum vs. measurement
|
||||
|
||||
## Limitations
|
||||
|
||||
- Used CVC-fixed sNME (not ESSM) → enhanced g_A value
|
||||
- Song et al. (2025) contradicts this result using ESSM
|
||||
|
||||
## References
|
||||
|
||||
- [[Shape Factor C(W, g_A)]]
|
||||
- [[SSM — Spectrum Shape Method]]
|
||||
- [[Song et al. (2025)]]
|
||||
- [[Ramalho & Suhonen (2024)]]
|
||||
+43
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
|
||||
# Song et al. (2025) — The measurement of 99Tc β-decay spectrum and implications for g_A
|
||||
|
||||
## Citation
|
||||
|
||||
Song, J.W., Ramalho, M., Lee, M.K., et al. (2025). The measurement of the ⁹⁹Tc β-decay spectrum and its implications for the effective value of weak axial coupling. *arXiv:2506.17544*.
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Results
|
||||
|
||||
| Model | g_A^eff | sNME [fm³] | χ²_ν | p-value |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| glekpn (CloseCVC) | 1.1 | 0.0674 | 1.106 | 0.12 |
|
||||
| jj45pnb (CloseCVC) | 1.0 | 0.0681 | 1.244 | 0.004 |
|
||||
| MQPM (CloseCVC) | 1.0 | 0.0651 | 1.644 | <0.0001 |
|
||||
| **glekpn (FarCVC)** | **1.2** | **−0.0698** | **1.066** | **0.22** |
|
||||
| jj45pnb (FarCVC) | 1.0 | −0.0669 | 1.097 | 0.14 |
|
||||
| MQPM (FarCVC) | 1.0 | −0.0683 | 1.095 | 0.14 |
|
||||
|
||||
## Methodology
|
||||
|
||||
- **Detector**: MMC with 4π gold absorber, energy threshold 10 keV
|
||||
- **Nuclear models**: glekpn, jj45pnb (NSM), MQPM
|
||||
- **sNME treatment**: ESSM (sNME as fit parameter) — two solutions per g_A (closeCVC and farCVC)
|
||||
- **Fit range**: 10–41 keV and 50–280 keV (excluding Gd X-ray region)
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Findings
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Contradicts Paulsen et al. (2024)**: The enhanced g_A value (1.526) is not supported when using proper ESSM treatment
|
||||
2. **Quenched g_A**: Best fit is g_A^eff = 1.0–1.2 with farCVC sNME
|
||||
3. **Best model**: glekpn with g_A^eff = 1.2, sNME = −0.0698 fm³, χ²_ν = 1.066
|
||||
|
||||
## Implications
|
||||
|
||||
- Resolves the inconsistency between first-forbidden and higher-forbidden nonunique transitions
|
||||
- Supports quenched g_A consistent with Suhonen's review values
|
||||
- Demonstrates the importance of proper sNME treatment in SSM analysis
|
||||
|
||||
## References
|
||||
|
||||
- [[Shape Factor C(W, g_A)]]
|
||||
- [[SSM — Spectrum Shape Method]]
|
||||
- [[ESSM — Enhanced Spectrum Shape Method]]
|
||||
- [[Paulsen et al. (2024)]]
|
||||
- [[Ramalho & Suhonen (2024)]]
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user